Revision history [back]

sirry to say so, but landmark andidentification are 2 entirely seperate things.

sirry to say so, but landmark andidentification and identification are 2 entirely seperate things.

sirry sorry to say so, but finding landmark and identification are 2 entirely seperate / unrelated things.

sorry to say so, but finding landmark landmarks and identification are 2 entirely seperate / unrelated things.

sorry to say so, but finding landmarks and identification are 2 entirely seperate / unrelated things.you can't.

(your research seems please understand, that any facial landmarks model will * interpolate* a given mean model to suck here.)your actual findings from some image, thus the results from it won't be significant enough for identification

you can't.

please understand, that any facial landmarks model will * interpolate* a given mean model to your actual findings from some image, thus the results from it won't be significant enough for identification

you can't.

please understand, that any facial landmarks model will * interpolate* a given mean model to your actual findings from some image, thus the results from it won't be significant enough for identification

forget that idea, read up on facenet instead ;)

you can't.can't (or rather -- you shoudn't even try !)

please understand, that any facial landmarks model will interpolate a given mean model to your actual findings from some image, thus the results from it won't be significant enough for identification

forget that idea, read up on facenet instead ;)

you can't (or rather -- you shoudn't even try !)

please understand, that any facial landmarks model will interpolate a given mean model to your actual findings from some image, thus the results from it won't be significant enough for identification

forget that idea, read up on facenet instead ;)

you can't (or rather -- you shoudn't even try !)

please understand, that any facial landmarks model will interpolate a given a mean model to your actual findings from some image, thus the results from it won't be significant enough for identification

forget that idea, read up on facenet instead ;)

(opencv's dnn module willl even able to handle it !!)

you can't (or rather -- you shoudn't even try !)

please understand, that any facial landmarks model will interpolate a given a mean model to your actual findings from some image, thus the results from it won't be significant enough for identification

forget that idea, read up on facenet instead ;)

(opencv's dnn module willl even able to handle it !!)