1 | initial version |
Thanks for the suggestions.I think it is better to explain the approach i took for any future reference.
Note : Even though this method is working, you'll notice that angles such as 0, 45, 90, 180 has way more pixel points than others.This is due to square shape of pixels.
2 | No.2 Revision |
Thanks for the suggestions.I think it is better to explain the approach i took for any future reference.
Note : Even though this method is working, you'll notice that angles such as 0, 45, 90, 180 has way more pixel points than others.This is due to square shape of pixels.
3 | No.3 Revision |
Thanks for the suggestions.I think it is better to explain the approach i took for any future reference.
Note : Even though this method is working, you'll notice that angles such as 0, 45, 90, 180 has way more pixel points than others.This is due to square shape of pixels.
4 | No.4 Revision |
Thanks for the suggestions.I think it is better to explain the approach i took for any future reference.
Note : Even though this method is working, you'll notice that angles such as 0, 45, 90, 180 has way more pixel points than others.This is due to square shape of pixels.